The following letter was sent to Nick Griffin from Wigan BNP
Wigan BNP Activists: Extraordinary General Meeting
Dear Nick,
As you are aware we have been extremely distressed over the discord in the party during the past month and it has only been our faith in Nationalism and its importance for our future that has kept us from throwing in the towel. We have read both sides of the dispute and have been struck by the difference in tone between them.
The intemperate language employed by Simon Darby in his blog when he first accused the “rebels” of being “Nazis2 and the following day “Searchlight moles” does not incline one to believe other statements he makes. A blog full of contradictory statements is to say the least unpersuasive.
By contrast the “enoughisenough” blog is a lesson in restraint with no extreme or unbelievable statements. There is certainly no evidence of an attempt to take over the party. Admittedly it was foolish and wrong to start the blog. It would have been much better to resign in protest over the failings of Mark Collett and Dave Hannam but it was even more foolish to publish details of the dispute on the BNP web site for all to see and to brand those who support Sadie et al as Nazis. To then offer these Nazis an amnesty if they returned to the fold seems to be the height of political naivety and would surely be used against us by our opponents.
The appearance of South African security people in the higher echelons of our party is a certain vote loser and will also be exploited by our opponents.
Why do we need all this security and spying on our neighbours? We are a legitimate party and if we behave as such we should have no fear of the machinations of our opponents and have no secrets worth spying on.
We do NOT believe Sadie, Kenny and matt are Nazis or Searchlight moles, indeed they have been hard working and a credit to the party as have Nick Cass, Jonathan Bowden, Bev Jones, Richard Purdy and many others who are not now with us. We can not afford to lose good people such as these.
The only people who have brought the party in to disrepute are Mark Collett and Dave Hannam but they remain in the party.
On the website it says that no person is above the party and we heartily agree. We can’t see therefore why these two remain an exception to the rule. If they cared about the Party they would take a back seat or are they agents of the state? They have certainly caused more strife than any one from MI5 could have done.
In spite of the above, we remain committed to the Party and you as leader but our enthusiasm is much diminished.
Just think what we could achieve without this dissent.
The feeling of our group and prospective members is that while good workers are being sacked and trouble causers retained we will make no progress. We are losing members because of this and several people who indicated the intention of joining no longer wish to do so.
We resolve therefore to keep our group going on a minimum maintenance basis but feel we are wasting our time in actively campaigning until matters are resolved.
We hope and pray for a speedy, sensible and amicable conclusion to this sorry dispute or our Party and country are doomed.
This will not go away.
Yours sincerely,
Charles Mather,
Wigan BNP Organiser
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Charles Mather, BNP twat of Wigan, demands the unanswerable to be answered:
“A question to the organic lobby: would it or would it not have been a good thing if in 1845 a pesticide had been available to combat potato blight in Ireland?”
(Letter to The Times, 3 March 2006:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article736677.ece).
Well Mather, you build us a time machine and we’ll then get the answer.
The following statement by Wigan BNP in the last paragraph to their letter to BNP Nick Griffin is very telling:
“Party and country”
Wigan BNP, when they refer to the BNP, use a capital ‘P’ to begin the word ‘Party’. Yet, the juxtaposition with ‘country’ is very telling: they only begin ‘country’ with a lower case ‘c’. This indicates that in the political ideology of at least Wigan BNP the ‘country’ is subordinate to the ‘Party’ i.e. the BNP. So, it seems Party, the BNP, precedes country. But, this is typical of fascist ideology that consecrates the ‘Party’ as the re-incarnation of the ‘country’. Ahh well ....
Post a Comment